Why did Bill Clinton underperform in California in 1996? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 02:51:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Bill Clinton underperform in California in 1996? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Bill Clinton underperform in California in 1996?  (Read 2453 times)
twenty42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 861
United States


« on: October 25, 2017, 04:13:58 AM »
CA’s rock-solid D status wasn’t cemented until 2008. From 1992 to 2004, it was more where OR or DE is today...heavily D leaning, but ever-so-slightly in play in a hypothetical R landslide.
Logged
twenty42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 861
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2017, 09:08:17 AM »
Quote from: libertpaulian on October 27, 2017, 06:37:26 AM
If he "underperformed," how did he improve on his PV and EC margins?


Less Perot impact, and FL narrowly flipped. But remember he lost three of his 1992 states...most incumbents keep their original map.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.