How long can Jeb survive with under-10% polling and poor debate performances? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 03:16:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  How long can Jeb survive with under-10% polling and poor debate performances? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How long can Jeb survive with under-10% polling and poor debate performances?
#1
until October
 
#2
until November
 
#3
until December
 
#4
until January
 
#5
not until the primaries
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 47

Author Topic: How long can Jeb survive with under-10% polling and poor debate performances?  (Read 2863 times)
weixiaobao
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 711
« on: September 15, 2015, 01:07:35 AM »

He will be the 45th President.

Source: dudeabides
Logged
weixiaobao
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 711
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2015, 03:27:41 AM »
« Edited: September 15, 2015, 03:33:26 AM by weixiaobao »

Fiorina and Kasich rise was great.  It take away Bush's supporters.  It is just too many fishes in that small pond.  I don't think Bush can even rise up to be #2 anymore unless a few of these people drop out (Kasich, Rubio, Fiorina).

I like Kasich a lot.  I hope he placed second or win New Hampshire.  That will like a nail in the coffin of Bush.  Kasich of course is a much easier opponent for Trump than Bush.

I see many people ranked Rubio as #1 on a lot of power ranking.  I think Rubio is done for the moment Trump shifted the conversation to immigration.
Logged
weixiaobao
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 711
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2015, 02:21:31 AM »

I'm not a fan of Jeb Bush, but this thread is ridiculous. He is polling in third place in a 16-candidate field, and he remains the most-supported traditional candidate.

Not really, in Iowa, Trump increasingly becoming a non factor.  He at best 4th after Cruz.

Rubio and Fiorina has about the same % as he is in Iowa, so technically he is tied for 4th, 5th, and 6th place in Iowa (and statistically tie with many more bottom feeders).

In New Hampshire, Bush is below Trump, Carson, Kasich, Fiorina.  About a tie with Cruz over there.  So it meant he is tied with 5th and 6th place in New Hampshire.

In South Carolina, he is below Trump, Carson, and Cruz.  Statistically, he tied with many bottom feeders.

So the first 3 states, he is a non factor despite having the most endorsements and the most money raise.  Is this thread still ridiculous?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.