Wow, you weren't kidding, this whole interview is excruciatingly painful.
I got to the part on breaking up financial institutions and had to stop because his arrogance and incompetence was just infuriating me.
So much of the interview comes down to "I don't know" or "I haven't studied that" or "I'm not sure what the implications would be" or "I believe that" for things that aren't true.
This guy wants to undertake an extremely radical shaking-up of the US economy, and he's not even confident about what would happen or how it would work! He walks around like he's the leading expert on the evils of Wall Street and how to fix him, and here he is getting stumped again and again on his
one issue -- the issue he pivots to on every question because "fix this and you fix everything" -- by a couple journalists. Reminds me of the Palin/Couric interview.
Just from the last part I read before quitting: