Democratic WV primary + NE fake contest results thread (1st polls close @7:30ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 05:12:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic WV primary + NE fake contest results thread (1st polls close @7:30ET) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic WV primary + NE fake contest results thread (1st polls close @7:30ET)  (Read 17376 times)
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

« on: May 10, 2016, 07:11:48 PM »

Clinton up by a vote now
3631-3630 4% in
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2016, 07:23:37 PM »

Anyone else shocked of how close it is? I expected Bernie to demolish Hillary at the start. I bet the delegate spread will be tied.
most of these results are absentee ballots which in the past have favored Hillary Clinton, only two election day precincts  have reported.  
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2016, 07:31:00 PM »

Clinton leads 9501-8830 with 9% in now
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2016, 07:39:25 PM »

Sanders back up 11,681-11,654 with 12% in
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2016, 07:41:20 PM »

Clinton up 12,906-12,759 13% in
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2016, 09:32:49 PM »

I bet Hillary has a good chance of winning in my state.

I'm thinking this too if the Nebraska primary is any indication. I'd love a map of the Democratic primary though, every site just has the Democratic caucus and GOP primary results.
Here is a map here
http://electionresults.sos.ne.gov/resultsSW.aspx?text=Race&type=PRS&map=CTY

you can see county + precinct breakdown as well 
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2016, 09:57:00 PM »

Counties that are different from their Caucus- Primary Result, Caucus Result listed first
Cherry County Clinton 65-35, Sanders 53.9-46.1
Thomas Clinton 100-0, 61.1-38.9
McPherson County Clinton 75-25, Sanders 64.3-35.9
Keith County Clinton 52-48, Sanders 58.5-41.5
Harlan County Clinton 52-48, Sanders 58.4-41.6
Pawnee County Clinton 73-27, Sanders 53.7-46.3
Richardson County Clinton 56-44, Sanders 50.6-49.4
Seward County Sanders 58-42, Clinton 53-47
Cuming County Clinton 57-43, Sanders 55.2-44.8
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

« Reply #7 on: May 10, 2016, 10:24:19 PM »
« Edited: May 10, 2016, 10:27:52 PM by Pacific Councilor 1184AZ »

Would the DNC give Farrell a delegate though? They never gave delegates to Randal Terry and co in 2012
They did not get delegates because they did not inform the state parties  of the names of their delegates, as well as failing to meet certain qualifications.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/16/randall-terry-loses-his-delegate-to-the-democratic-convention/?_r=0
http://www.wrcbtv.com/story/17525058/john-wolfe-cries-foul-in-louisiana-primary
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.