Statilius the Epicurean
Thersites
Junior Chimp
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 5,618
![](./avatars/Other/INT_O_Scotland.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: September 29, 2022, 09:25:53 PM » |
|
|
« edited: September 29, 2022, 09:32:59 PM by Statilius the Epicurean »
|
I imagine it would respond with a conventional NATO air campaign designed to destroy the Russian military in Ukraine and disable any further deployment of tactical nuclear weapons. NATO has dominance in a conventional conflict so a nuclear response would be unnecessary.
If despite a conventional NATO intervention Russia continued to use tactical nuclear weapons effectively or say escalated to NATO territory, then I think you may see a nuclear response in kind.
|