How the election would have gone without rotten boroughs (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 04:10:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Dereich)
  How the election would have gone without rotten boroughs (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How the election would have gone without rotten boroughs  (Read 2087 times)
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
« on: November 15, 2016, 08:02:43 PM »

Here is the map if illegal immigrants were not counted in congressional apportionment:



308-230
Logged
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2017, 08:43:43 AM »

So basically what you are saying is nothing changes?

And, why are you using the phrase "rotten boroughs?"  Seems kind of suspect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotten_and_pocket_boroughs

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

A large noncitizen population implies that the municipality will have considerably fewer eligible voters than it ought to.

Trump was denied 2 electoral votes by this error in apportionment (fewer than I thought when I started the map). Although insignificant, they are a few scenarios where it might have made the difference.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.