How did Ronald Reagan do well in the west compared to south in 1984? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 10:53:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  How did Ronald Reagan do well in the west compared to south in 1984? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How did Ronald Reagan do well in the west compared to south in 1984?  (Read 767 times)
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« on: February 08, 2016, 07:29:00 PM »

Reagan being a Westerner must have something to do with it.

And yet Mondale literally did better than Carter in California....just sayin'.
The home state advantage typically wears off for reelection. Eisenhower did worse in Kansas in 1956 than in 1952 and Clinton did worse in Arkansas in 1996 than in 1992. FDR avoided this two out of his three reelections (New York swung Republican in 1940) as did Nixon and Bush Jr., but it happens. Obama also did worse in Illinois in 2012, but that was to be expected since he did worse than he did in 2008 overall.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 11 queries.