Expected Changes from 2012 to 2016 (Trends) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 01:46:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Expected Changes from 2012 to 2016 (Trends) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Expected Changes from 2012 to 2016 (Trends)  (Read 943 times)
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« on: August 25, 2015, 03:20:45 PM »

I apologize if this is in the wrong forum, but since it has to do with trends, I thought it belonged here.

So I did the math and found out how Democratic/Republican each state was compared to the nation as a whole in 2012 by subtracting 3.86% from the Democratic margin, because Obama won nationwide by 3.86%. That is what I call the 2012 "basemap".

I would've done this myself, but fortunately Dave saved me the trouble by including a "trend" map in the presidential elections, which shows how much more Democratic/Republican each state became since the "basemap" of the last election, or in this case, from 2008 to 2012. I added each state's trend to its 2012 margins, and created what I expect the 2016 "basemap" to look something like.




DC: D+80.89%
HI: D+39.70%
VT: D+33.74%
NY: D+29.05%
RI: D+26.66%
MD: D+26.26%
CA: D+21.73%
MA: D+20.02%
NJ: D+19.57%
ME: D+12.80%
WA: D+12.10%
CT: D+11.84%
DE: D+11.82%
IL: D+8.15%
OR: D+7.38%
NM: D+4.72%
MN: D+4.69%
MI: D+2.07%
IA: D+1.63%
CO: D+1.32%
NH: D+1.10%
VA: D+0.99%
OH: D+0.92%
NV: D+0.41%
PA: D+0.01%
WI: R+0.48%
FL: R+1.51%
NC: R+4.86%
AK: R+6.90%
AZ: R+10.07%
MS: R+10.28%
GA: R+10.87%
SC: R+12.42%
LA: R+16.24%
MO: R+19.06%
TX: R+20.25%
IN: R+21.88%
AL: R+23.25%
MT: R+25.37%
TN: R+26.18%
AR: R+27.98%
SD: R+28.09%
KS: R+28.84%
NE: R+29.08%
KY: R+29.60%
ND: R+31.06%
OK: R+36.25%
ID: R+38.76%
WV: R+40.81%
WY: R+49.86%
UT: R+68.39%


Of course, this is assuming that the trends remain the same from 2012-2016 as they were from 2008-2012, which is extremely unlikely. Still, I find it interesting how, from the 2012 basemap, Michigan and New Mexico go from being Democratic-leaning states to swing states, and North Carolina goes from being a Republican-leaning state to a swing state.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2015, 08:04:02 PM »

Here's a close Republican victory if these numbers are accurate. Nevada is the tipping point.



Of course these numbers aren't accurate, but it's still a fun map.
Man, that map looks weird.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2015, 08:55:13 PM »

Here's a close Republican victory if these numbers are accurate. Nevada is the tipping point.



Of course these numbers aren't accurate, but it's still a fun map.
Man, that map looks weird.

Not that weird if the Democrat bleeds non-college white and Hispanic support while holding Obama's black support and gaining a bit with college whites.  It looks like the narrowest Jeb win over Hillary pre-email and pre-Trump.  The only truly difficult part to explain is Ohio.
I mean a Republican Wisconsin without also winning Iowa looks really weird, as does Republican Pennsylvania but Democratic Ohio and Virginia.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.