Argument against Christian God

[Kingpoleon]

To pretend to have debunked the existence of a religion or philosophy by pointing out that there are, in fact, others is an impressive feat. Congratulations.

[Kingpoleon]

That Judaism still exists, as Jesus did not meet the standards for the Messiah of that faith, is a good argument against the Christian Yahweh. Not that this in itself isupports, or there is a priori support of the existence of the 'Jewish Yahweh' by extension.

I find it rather odd to assert that the lack of Jewish converts, when in fact there were a huge number, is indicative that Jesus was not the Christ.

[Kingpoleon]

Other religions have their own authors coming up with ideas. That’s a weak argument.

I have never personally experienced seeing apologetic books by people from other religions, so I am forced to conclude this is merely an atheistic delusion.

[Kingpoleon]

I recommend Sagan's "A demon haunted world" and the Dalai Lama's "The universe in a single atom."

I’m sorry, I don’t think you understand. I am rejecting your argument from experience as a hallucination, and must therefore conclude these books don’t exist.

[Kingpoleon]

Maybe I am just a butterfly having a nightmare that I am only just a man or am I only dreaming that you exist... who really knows anything with absolute certainty, after all?

I was mocking the most common opposition to the argument from religious experience which suggests that such experiences are illusionary or delusional.

[Kingpoleon]

Aren’t they culturally determined? I don’t generally hear about a little Baptist boy  in Houston hearing the Hindu Gods in heaven speaking Sanskrit.

I suppose I was arguing more from an argument of religious feeling than religious experience. But it does seem that such experiences obviously have some correlation with culture. This is not a strong indicator of anything except that more and more people must be accused of irrational delusions for the materialist to be correct.

[Kingpoleon]

So, many people once we’re scared of eclipsed yet even medieval Europeans knew it was just a shadow(of the moon or the Earth).

This is one of two arguments: 1) people were once afraid of eclipses, they were wrong, therefore many people could be wrong now; 2) eclipses are an illusion, therefore other things can be illusions, therefore these are all illusions.