I have a problem understanding this one:
pres koops mub howz rezz teg gripp
After looking at it 15 minutes I think I understand most of it but I have to interpret it with no certainty.
The Supreme Court would probably find that valid, since it doesn’t badmouth me.
Scott, if you think that’s bad, a couple years ago there was a (possibly tied) vote with two spoiled ballots, both spoiled by the voter (voting for my ticket) writing in how much they hated me as a running mate. Those votes were kindly invalidated by the election administrator, who, as my rival for the Vice Presidency, felt it necessary to defend me by discarding the votes of those who attacked me.
