Best Chief of Staff? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 10:54:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Best Chief of Staff? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Best Chief of Staff?
#1
John Steelman (1946-1953)
 
#2
Sherman Adams (1953-1958)
 
#3
Wilton Persons (1958-1961)
 
#4
Kenneth O'Donnell (1961-1963)
 
#5
Marvin Watson (1963-1968)
 
#6
James R. Jones (1968-1969)
 
#7
H.R. Haldeman (1969-1973)
 
#8
Al Haig (1973-1974)
 
#9
Donald Rumsfield (1974-1975)
 
#10
Dick Cheney (1975-1977)
 
#11
Hamilton Jordan (1979-1980)
 
#12
Jack Watson (1980-1981)
 
#13
James Baker (1981-1985)
 
#14
Don Regan (1985-1987)
 
#15
Howard Baker (1987-1988)
 
#16
Kenneth Duberstein (1988-1989)
 
#17
John Sununu (1989-1991)
 
#18
Samuel Skinner (1991-1992)
 
#19
James Baker (1992-1993)
 
#20
Mark McLarty (1993-1994)
 
#21
Leon Panetta (1994-1997)
 
#22
Erskine Bowles (1997-1998)
 
#23
John Podesta (1998-2001)
 
#24
Andrew Card (2001-2006)
 
#25
Joshua Bolton (2006-2009)
 
#26
Rahm Emmanuel (2009-2010)
 
#27
Pete Rouse (2010-2011)
 
#28
Bill Daley (2011-2012)
 
#29
Jack Lew (2012-2013)
 
#30
Denis McDonough (2013-2017)
 
#31
Reince Priebus (2017-2017)
 
#32
John Kelly (2017-?)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: Best Chief of Staff?  (Read 774 times)
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« on: July 31, 2017, 09:45:13 PM »

Baker, Cheney, and Emmanuel were all extremely effective. I voted Baker.

Rumsfeld and Cheney at some point switched from being foreign policy realists like Ford, Kissinger, Powell, and Rice, to being neoconservatives. In the 1970s, though, they were pretty great.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2017, 10:02:37 PM »

Rumsfeld and Cheney at some point switched from being foreign policy realists like Ford, Kissinger, Powell, and Rice, to being neoconservatives. In the 1970s, though, they were pretty great.

As early as their first period in power--that is, the mid 1970's, and the first time that is relevant here--they stood notably to Kissinger's "right".
Not really. Phil Crane and Alexander Haig were the main two hawks at the time.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2017, 10:53:36 PM »

Rumsfeld and Cheney at some point switched from being foreign policy realists like Ford, Kissinger, Powell, and Rice, to being neoconservatives. In the 1970s, though, they were pretty great.

As early as their first period in power--that is, the mid 1970's, and the first time that is relevant here--they stood notably to Kissinger's "right".
Not really. Phil Crane and Alexander Haig were the main two hawks at the time.

Fascinating.

I apologize if there's a misunderstanding - Cheney and Rumsfeld, at the time, pretended to be moderates/business conservatives and were hardly critics of Kissinger.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.