What do you think would have happened in 1992 without Perot? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 09:06:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  What do you think would have happened in 1992 without Perot? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What do you think would have happened in 1992 without Perot?  (Read 3556 times)
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« on: May 29, 2017, 11:40:51 PM »

284: Bill Clinton/Paul Tsongas - 47.3%
254: George Bush/Dan Quayle - 47.0%
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2017, 06:50:24 PM »
Perot was essentially a big voice as a critic of George H. W. Bush, and being an independent made the criticisms seem far less partisan.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.