Possible Future SCOTUS Nominees over the Next Four Years(Exclude Garland) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 06:46:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Possible Future SCOTUS Nominees over the Next Four Years(Exclude Garland) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Possible Future SCOTUS Nominees over the Next Four Years(Exclude Garland)  (Read 6629 times)
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« on: September 11, 2016, 05:43:38 PM »

Democratic:
Cate Edwards, Neal Katyal, Thurgood Marshall, Jr., Robin Carnahan, Vanita Gupta, Janet Napolitano, Mary Philips, Brian Wimes, Anthony Romero, William Hochul, Jr.(and compromise: John G. Levi/Martha Minow)

Republican:
Catherine Hanaway, Leslie Rutledge, Pat DeWine, Jeffrey Chiesa, Eric Skrmetta, Corey Stewart, Greg Edwards(compromise: Christopher Jacobs)

Either:
Jeffrey Rosen, David F. Levi, Roslynn Mauskopf, John Bel Edwards, Brian Sandoval
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2016, 04:02:16 PM »

Does anyone think that Ken Mehlman is a possibility?
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2016, 10:31:38 PM »

Roslynn Mauskopf, Risa Vetri Ferman, or Mary Beth Buchanan are probably his best picks for females.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2016, 04:40:02 PM »

I think he's going to pick a middle of the road conservative, not a Scalia type.

My dream would be someone who actually tries to follow the law, no matter where it leads, rather than be a predictable block vote, as on most controversial cases, the existing justices are. The one who isn't is erratic, and not a very good legal technician. Sad. Yes, Roberts also sometimes departs (his Obamacare decision was inspired genius, and I think did faithfully follow the law), and may have the best mind on the Court, which is why he is my favorite justice.

Roberts also ruled against national recognition of your marriage. It's very impressive that your belief in his exception legal jurisprudence so heavily outweighed that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.