Attitudes towards a woman President (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:37:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Attitudes towards a woman President (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which best describes your attitude towards a woman President?
#1
It would be beneficial for society to have a woman President provided she agreed with my views
 
#2
I'd vote for my party/ideology's candidate and it doesn't matter what gender they are
 
#3
I'd vote for a woman President who shared my views, but am uncomfortable with the idea of a woman President
 
#4
I would never vote for a woman President
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 79

Author Topic: Attitudes towards a woman President  (Read 10812 times)
GLOBAL DICTATOR
Rookie
**
Posts: 52


« on: January 05, 2005, 09:15:45 PM »

Doubtful I would vote for a woman to be commander in chief of the armed forces, but I would if she was the most qualified candidate (likely by virtue of all the other ones sucking).
You're Not an Idiot!Not in this case anyway. I agree with you here.  A woman should never be President of the United States of America. Tradition does count for something. They also shouldn't be preachers/ministers.
Logged
GLOBAL DICTATOR
Rookie
**
Posts: 52


« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2005, 11:22:04 PM »

Doubtful I would vote for a woman to be commander in chief of the armed forces, but I would if she was the most qualified candidate (likely by virtue of all the other ones sucking).
You're Not an Idiot!Not in this case anyway. I agree with you here.  A woman should never be President of the United States of America. Tradition does count for something. They also shouldn't be preachers/ministers.

Uh, "tradition"? All presidents have also had blue eyes. Does that mean we should never elected a brown-eyed president?

Tradition counts for something, but tradition is not an excuse to never change. Tradition is simply a blockade when it interferes with progress.
Progress is not having a woman President.
Logged
GLOBAL DICTATOR
Rookie
**
Posts: 52


« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2005, 11:26:10 PM »

Doubtful I would vote for a woman to be commander in chief of the armed forces, but I would if she was the most qualified candidate (likely by virtue of all the other ones sucking).
You're Not an Idiot!Not in this case anyway. I agree with you here.  A woman should never be President of the United States of America. Tradition does count for something. They also shouldn't be preachers/ministers.

Very few Presidents have been preachers/ministers.  I'm not seeing a relationship here.
O.K., It's time to learn how to read.

I said that women should also not be preachers/ministers. I never said that any of our Presidents have been Preachers/Ministers. You weren't suppose to see any correlation, because no inference to any relationship between the 2 occupations was made.
Logged
GLOBAL DICTATOR
Rookie
**
Posts: 52


« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2005, 11:36:13 PM »


I said that women should also not be preachers/ministers. I never said that any of our Presidents have been Preachers/Ministers. You weren't suppose to see any correlation, because no inference to any relationship between the 2 occupations was made.

Then why mention them? 

BTW:  I woundn't vote for my priest for President.
ARE YOU REALLY PHILIP IN DISGUISE? Cause you sure lack comprehension, like he does. 
I mentioned the Priesthood because in my opinion, women should not be allowed to hold certain positions, the Presidency and the Priesthood are two of those positions that they should not ever be allowed to  hold. There are other occupations they shouldn't hold as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.