Fireworks Freedom Act of 2015 (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 01:49:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Fireworks Freedom Act of 2015 (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Fireworks Freedom Act of 2015 (Failed)  (Read 1793 times)
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


« on: July 29, 2015, 09:42:48 AM »

Thank You Mr Speaker and my friends in the Senate for taking this bill up,

 The current constitution does not rule on fireworks. Which means that it is up to the regions and only one region has laws on fireworks which is the Northeast Region. If my law goes into passed and signed by our president, it would number one allow citizens to use fireworks for their own personal use and create tax money for both the regions and the federal government. My region, The South, Midwest and Mideast all have no laws that talk about fireworks. Fireworks are not arms beacuse the definition of arms by The Webster Dictionary is "weapons, especially firearms" fireworks aren't considered firearms by any standards. If the senate passes this bill it will create more revenue for all governments local, regionally and federal create more jobs in every region beacuse it allows businesses to form and builds factories here in Atlasia, and allows your citizens that you represent to have fun.
I Thank that senate for their time and I ask them to pass; The Fireworks Freedom Act of 2015
Logged
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2015, 06:41:09 AM »

What are the laws in the Northeast regarding fireworks?


I am hessitant to have the Federal Gov't nullify any regional law, but especially one where the body is unaware of its contents. Wink
The Blue Law Repeal Act of 2012 allowed the use of fireworks.
It was signed by Governor AndrewCT back then
Here's the text
The Anti-Prohibition & Blue Law Repeal Act

A BILL to repeal and prohibit Northeastern laws that are found to be religiously motivated or otherwise unnecessary

1.) All existing laws which prohibit the consumption or sale of beer, wine, and spirits at neighborhood grocery and package stores on any day of the week are hereby repealed.

2.) All existing laws which prohibit gambling on any day of the week are hereby repealed.

3.) Town records may hereby be kept where liquor is sold.

4.) It is hereby legal to dispose of used razor blades.

5.) All legal firearms may be discharged in public highways, provided that they do not result in the harm of innocent citizens.

6.) Brothels are hereby legal in the Northeast.

7.) The sale of fireworks is hereby permitted to all Northeast residents above the age of seventeen.

8.) Hunting licenses and fishing licenses are no longer necessary to hunt or fish on one's own private property.

9.) On no day of any week are hunting or fishing prohibited activities.

10.) Players of professional sports shall not have to obtain a license to play on Sundays.

11.) "R"-rated movies are hereby allowed to be shown in drive-in theaters.

12.) The Northeast government may not prohibit activities on a given day of the week for religious reasons.
Logged
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2015, 07:47:28 AM »

On the topic. No, I won't support this Bill at all. Access to fireworks should be tightly controlled and regulated.

I'm sure people like to make things go boom, but they're dangerous and should be handled with care and training, not the least of which the well-known impact on domestic animals.
You can present an Admendment if you want.
Logged
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2015, 06:37:27 AM »

     I'm bothered by the broad stipulation of "all persons", which I suppose would include minors and felons. How about this:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Friendly.
Logged
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2015, 08:21:06 AM »

     I'm bothered by the broad stipulation of "all persons", which I suppose would include minors and felons. How about this:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Friendly.

I'm not sure a non-Senator can do this.
I'm just saying I like it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.