Debs and Thomas: The Socialists! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 09:02:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Debs and Thomas: The Socialists! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Debs and Thomas: The Socialists!  (Read 3629 times)
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

« on: September 11, 2006, 09:00:52 AM »

In the 30's Thomas and the Socialists did do better but most of the left wing/protest/working man vote went to that other socialist in the race FDR.

This is true. It's worth remembering, though, that FDR campaigned on a conservative platform- indeed, he ran against Hoover from the right. It's actually a bit of a mystery why Thomas didn't do better in 1932.

Thomas did alright, right at Debs average higher 2% range, in 1936 with a large pool of voters that would have supported Thomas going to FDR. He was then killed in 40, 44, and 48 because of his anti-war stance and the rise of the Soviet Union.

Also true. Which is unfortunate, because Thomas was a ferocious opponent of the Soviet Union (and he entered the race in 1948 only to provide a leftist alternative to Henry Wallace, whom he thought was being manipulated by the Communist Party).
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2006, 09:15:17 AM »

lol. Sure, he was a bit... inconsistent in the 1932 campaign, which is why Thomas would have my vote.

Of course, from 1933 on I'm a Roosevelt man.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.