Initial Inside Elections/Gonzales 2018 Senate ratings (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 07:32:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Initial Inside Elections/Gonzales 2018 Senate ratings (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Initial Inside Elections/Gonzales 2018 Senate ratings  (Read 6026 times)
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« on: January 19, 2017, 12:46:31 AM »

Too incumbent friendly but not to an absurd degree like Cook.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2017, 03:04:59 PM »

Would anyone (except MTT/TNV) have predicted Democrats picking up New Hampshire but not Wisconsin?
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2017, 04:02:20 PM »

Would anyone (except MTT/TNV) have predicted Democrats picking up New Hampshire but not Wisconsin?

Heisenberg also made it pretty clear that WI was much more competitive than NH. And quite frankly, it should have been obvious to everyone.

Well Wisconsin was not more "competitive" than New Hampshire. It was just more Republican.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2017, 04:55:21 PM »

Why people think Stabenow is Safe when her state just voted for Trump is beyond me. She's favored, sure, but not Safe.

Yeah, I mean, how could people possibly think Brian Sandoval and Terry Branstad were safe in 2014, after Obama won their states in 2012!?
Those are governors, different from Senators. Governor races are WAY less partisan, and they're also affected by the winds in the state government as well as the national government.

Collins might have been a better example.

But even with Collins, I'm not sure it was fair to call her Safe 2 years out. If Stabenow has consistent double digit leads in October 2018 (which isn't impossible) it will be pretty fair to call her Safe. Right now I think Likely is a fair rating for that seat.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2017, 02:31:34 PM »

For the record, I'd vote for the Republican candidate over Joe Manchin. Enough already with this guy.
This is dumb.



Joe Manchin is basically a moderate republican. If you're a democrat who wants a caucus that is more ideologically pure than it currently is, it only makes sense that you would seek to kick him out.

Who cares how ideologically pure the caucus is? I care about the Senate as a whole. Since Manchin's opponent in this case is a Republican, the only person worth comparing to him is that Republican. I hate Manchin but he's better than any Republican from West Virginia.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2017, 09:07:03 PM »

I mean, a caucus that consists solely of (insert your favorite Senator here) would be the ideologically purest caucus ever. But it would also be completely pointless. You might as well support the Green Party.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.