The 4 Orange County, California seats (39, 45, 48, and 49) need to be the top priority for the DCCC.
No point focusing on those of you lose all your modwestrn seats.
What else is there to lose? The three rural Minnesota seats and maybe WI-3? Beyond that the GOP is pretty much maxed out there.
The final democratic Iowa seat, potential for two seats in michigan, a seat in PA, seats in Wisconsin, and seats in Minnesota. If you lose the seats there, the gains are wiped out.
In Michigan? What seats? Every seat in that state that Dems hold is a Dem vote sink.
In Wisconsin, the only potential seat in any risk is WI-03. The other two Dem seats are safe Dem until the cows come home (and probably after that too).
So after 2016, Democrats' plan of attack isn't to win back areas that were always favorable to Democrats but rather try to pick off areas that have always liked Republicans but are now more diverse?
Glad to see they've learned nothing.
Well, most of those states except Wisconsin and Iowa will be losing districts anyway come 2020. And most of the surrounding districts are just barely Republican. Probably the national Dem's strategy is just to let the incumbents ride it out until 2020 and then get better maps in place once the seats are removed.
If none of them lost in 2016 then the chances of any of them getting voted out while Trump is in office are pretty much non-existent (as far as we can tell).
I will say that Minnesota is a bit scary.
I realize that this thread is about the House, but the Senate is still important, and unaffected by population changes. Sure, Georgia has a higher population than Wisconsin and Iowa combined, but it still only has two Senators.