NV-TargetPoint Consulting/Washington Free Beacon: Sanders & Clinton tied at 45% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 09:49:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  NV-TargetPoint Consulting/Washington Free Beacon: Sanders & Clinton tied at 45% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NV-TargetPoint Consulting/Washington Free Beacon: Sanders & Clinton tied at 45%  (Read 8084 times)
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« on: February 12, 2016, 08:59:23 PM »

Wow. Is it fair to say that the race is a toss-up if Sanders wins this?

I'd call it Lean Clinton if Sanders wins Nevada. It depends what the demographic breakdown looks like though.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2016, 08:33:56 AM »

538 forecasts are pointless with one poll. But at the very it least it seems like they threw out the Clinton skew in their "polls-plus" forecast after they saw how little impact Clinton's endorsements had.

I never understood that anyway. If Clinton's enorsements had a huge effect, wouldn't that be reflected in the polls?
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2016, 10:41:08 AM »

538 forecasts are pointless with one poll. But at the very it least it seems like they threw out the Clinton skew in their "polls-plus" forecast after they saw how little impact Clinton's endorsements had.

I never understood that anyway. If Clinton's enorsements had a huge effect, wouldn't that be reflected in the polls?

No.  The idea is that, when they went back to look at what was predictive of election day results in presidential primaries past, yes, polling in the state was of course the most predictive thing.  But "party support" (as measured in this case by endorsements, since that's a quantifiable thing) also had some predictive power, in the sense that if two candidates polled the same a month before election day, the one with more endorsements was more likely to see his/her polling numbers hold up.  As you get closer to election day though, the endorsements become less predictive, while the polling becomes more predictive.


Ah, I see now.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.