Nyman Weekly June 2016 Presidential Debate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 10:32:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Nyman Weekly June 2016 Presidential Debate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Nyman Weekly June 2016 Presidential Debate  (Read 965 times)
Leinad
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -7.91

« on: June 14, 2016, 10:21:35 PM »

Thank you, Ted, and Smith, for hosting this debate!

This election is one of immense importance. Of course I would say that, given that I'm running, but I think it's objectively true. With the Constitutional Convention we saw a grassroots movement that silenced the doubters and made substantive improvements to Atlasia--all through the system set forth in the previous Constitution.

But the Convention is merely a prologue to the book we're about to write. Whoever wins this election will play a major part in setting the tone for the new era of Atlasia.

As my slogan implies, what we need is "Clear Leadership for the Future." We need efficient leadership, with experience in executive offices, knowledge of Atlasia's problems, the clear solutions for those problems, and the ability to make those solutions a reality for the future of Atlasia.

I've already released my economic plan, and as the election rolls closer I plan to release more policy plans, and I look forward to having this debate about the issues that face this country.
Logged
Leinad
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -7.91

« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2016, 12:47:14 AM »

Over the years since ISIS was formed, it has become a major threat to Atlasia and its people. The group even attacked several Atlasian cities before the new Constitution was passed. How would you address ISIS in your term as president?

I will start off by addressing the concept of military engagement: war is one of the worst things in humanity--a transaction of human lives and resources for destruction and instability. It is something we must avoid if possible, but unfortunately it is not always possible. The use of aggression is only justified if it is against a side which has committed aggression itself. And ISIL, as you said, has attacked Atlasia and I'm sad to say it will continue to do so--making self-defense not only just but needed.

We must support our allies in the region, and put as few Atlasians in harm's way as possible. We must have a clear strategy of defeating ISIL with minimal cost--both economic cost and, more importantly, human cost--both during and after the conflict.

I must say, I agree with Truman's assertion that we must ally with moderate Islam to defeat radical Islam. There are many peaceful Muslims -- we need to work with them to find and defeat the radical elements. We must attack terrorism at it's root instead of focusing on merely cutting the branches.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I believe in free trade and think that tariffs do little to improve anything. Instead, they restrict business at the cost of the consumer. These rates aren't magically absorbed by the business. Instead they're passed on to everyday Atlasians in the form of increased prices. The best way to keep jobs from leaving Atlasia and the best way to increase wages without increasing prices is to lower business taxes.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

There are two keys to increasing activity as president:

For one thing, the president must be active personally. Both by providing updates in public, and by annoyingly nagging friendly reminding various government officeholders to stay active as well. While you can't single-handedly increase activity, it's the President's responsibility to do their part to ensure government is running smoothly, specifically the executive branch.

Also, we must identify inactive officeholders and work with regions to encourage activity across all of Atlasia, not to mention encouraging recruitment of the many active forum users not in the game. What makes Atlasia great is when regional governments are strong and successful - they provide a wonderful outlet for new members to get involved, eventually moving on to higher offices.

I understand that activity feeds on itself--an inactive game will lead to apathy, and thus decrease activity. An active game will act as a magnet for more people to join, and more people already here to be more active themselves. And this is not only activity while in office, but competitive and publically active campaigns, which I think Truman and I have both been working hard to do in this election. Smiley
Logged
Leinad
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -7.91

« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2016, 11:41:00 PM »

I am the only candidate with any experience leading a body of this size.

I understand how tricky it was to lead the ConCon, although I think that being Governor for 8 months is much better experience for the Presidency. Presiding Officer is probably more similar to Speaker than President--where the decisions are more procedure-based than policy-based.

As Governor, I kept near constant dialogue with the Speaker, and frequent dialogue with the other Legislators, and was active in making the legislation as good as possible. Of course, with a VP and a more active and experienced legislature at the Federal level, I may not need to be that hands-on, but the point remains that I am the only candidate with executive experience.

And I know you were busy with the ConCon, but in your first two terms as a Senator you only introduced 2 pieces of legislation--for comparison, I introduced 3 pieces of legislation as Governor, and 3 pieces of legislation in one month as Southern Legislator before that. Of course, that doesn't count the legislation, both as Governor and in my brief time in the Senate, that I "wrote," in a sense, by massively amending it.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Is this related to Atlasian voting regulations? Of course, we had that evergreen v. Rpryor case recently, but that was decided in favor of letting those votes count, generally speaking controversy over voter suppression is rare. What, exactly, do you mean by that?

The best way to increase wages without increasing prices is to lower business taxes.
But to market tax cuts for big business as a "one stop solution" that will make wages go up, prices go down, and send our employment numbers to the moon is just not accurate

I'm not saying it's a "one stop solution," though. I didn't go in detail for that question--since it was about tariffs, not employment--but I've also proposed to make pay raises and new hirings tax deductible. This is the incentive to pay workers more.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Amen.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.