And my point still stands. You will have constantly 4 representatives who will have their voice mattering much less than the 5 others----> inactivity
Not saying your point lacks merit, but would it be valid inverted? As in, if 4 Representatives being less powerful than others leads to less activity, would 5 Representatives being more powerful than others lead to more activity?
Now, with regards to my own opinion, I see both points, but as of now I'm leaning towards Yankee's purely due to the novelty factor. It's more fun if we shake things up here and there, and make there be some differences between each chamber. If it doesn't work, of course, we could change it fairly easily.