Cook Political Report: Initial House + Senate Ratings (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 07:21:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Cook Political Report: Initial House + Senate Ratings (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Cook Political Report: Initial House + Senate Ratings  (Read 3122 times)
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


« on: February 04, 2017, 08:50:46 PM »

I don't get why the GOP should even bother with NH-01. Even if Shea-Porter were vulnerable (and she isn't), the Republican would either be guaranteed to be a one-termer or a liberal "RINO". Same is true for Annie Kuster's district.

NH-02 is Safe D and NH-01 is Likely D IMO. The GOP should focus on defending Poliquin and maybe finding a decent candidate to run against King rather than wasting time and money in NH.
Hell, the GOP is going to be needing to spend tons of money to save Darrell Issa's seat.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.