Barack Obama

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

So, the Dems could nominate either Hillary The Witch, Loser Gore, Loser Kerry...or Barack Hussein Obama!  LOL! 

As Peggy Noonan wrote the day after Bush's reelection: "I do not know what the Democratic Party spent, in toto, on the 2004 election, but what they seem to have gotten for it is Barack Obama.  Let us savor."

http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110005844

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

what a hack.

Yeah, the witch comment went too far, so allow me to restate:

So, the Dems could nominate either Pantsuit Hillary Clinton, Loser TreeHugger Gore, Loser SwiftShifter Kerry...or Barack Hussein Obama! 
 ROFL!

 

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

Yeah, the witch comment went too far, so allow me to restate:

So, the Dems could nominate either Pantsuit Hillary Clinton, Loser TreeHugger Gore, Loser SwiftShifter Kerry...or Barack Hussein Obama! 
 ROFL!

Your raw wit and penetrating humor serves as an inspiration to us all. Thank you for your services.

I know it is hard for Dems to find humor in losing, but lose you will if you nominate any of these four.

Obama:
Barack is an Arab name.  Hussein is an Arab name.  I don't know the origin of the name Obama.  Do you think any Southern state would vote for someone named Barack?  Do you think the Jewish vote is going to go heavily to someone named Hussein?  What about the Catholic vote now that the Pope is on the Muslim hit list?  Do you think Obama is not going to be hurt from homegrown terrorism from black Muslims?  He would get KILLED in Ohio and Florida against almost any GOP potential nominee.

Kerry and Gore:
Remember, in 2000 and 2004, you Dems lost to someone who couldn’t formulate a coherent sentence.  And now you think the two losers from 2000 and 2004, Gore and Kerry, have a chance against an articulate GOP nominee in 2008?

Hillary:
The best GOP attack ad is a 30 second commercial of Hillary’s face.  Even her husband can’t stand her.  LOL!

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

your contempt for the voter knows no bounds. You think Jews are so dumb they won't vote for Obama because his name is derived from Arabic?

He's NOT a muslim.  People LIKE him.  Illinois is actually not all that liberal a state, even the Democrats, and he dominated in the primary even, even downstate, which is basically like Indiana.  The guy is appealing.  He may not win, but to dismiss him based merely on his name, is truly ignorant.

I didn't dismiss him on name only.  I could have mentioned he is also a Dem, a party that has won only 3 of the last 10 presidential races.  And I never said he was a Muslim; if he were, you and I wouldn't be having this conversation.

But don't let me dissuade you...please nominate him!

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

No you never said he was a muslim, just that Jews won't vote for someone named Hussein, and southerners won't vote for someone named Barack.

As much as I have my issues with the American voter, I don't believe they are that stupid.

Well, the Dems think they are that stupid.  That's why they used the Christian term "New Covenant" during the 2004 convention.  They thought they could win Christian votes by adopting Christian terms.  But the strategy didn't work because actions speak louder than words.

I am simply pointing out that having a black Muslim name, coupled with being a Dem of African origin, is NOT a good receipe for victory in a nation wide election in 2008.

And if you want to improve upon your party's .300 record since becoming soft on national defense, then it would be wise to pick someone outside of the four horsemen of Hillary, Gore, Kerry and Obama.

Every time since 1968 that national security has been a front-burner issue ('68,'72,'80,'04), your side has lost.  And I don't see peace coming anytime soon.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Another completely invalid anaylsis. "Because they couldn't formulate a coherent sentence" is not the reason why Al Gore and John Kerry lost. Why? Because look at who their opponent was. George W. Bush is pretty much the antithesis of coherency.

you should reread my statement and your response