1. That's not the article I linked to
2. That article is certainly not saying Rove is innocent
1. Never said it was the article you linked to. I referred to the article in my link as proof that anyone, even a Bush basher, who takes time to read the evidence presented so far, can not clearly conclude that Rove is being accused as the one who revealed her name.
2. Nor did I say that Rove is innocent. I am simply saying that people are putting words into these reporters mouths that the evidence does not yet support.
(The article you linked to does not provide any evidence that Rove is the leaker. It is simply speculation)