Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 11:09:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)  (Read 70001 times)
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« on: June 07, 2016, 10:21:43 PM »

Sanders is getting murdered everywhere but New Mexico right now.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2016, 01:17:39 AM »

Yeah, Sanders is probably going to drop out sometime in the next two weeks.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2016, 12:33:44 PM »

So it looks like we won't be getting an extremely late Sanders surge in California.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2016, 12:43:26 PM »

VBM ballots received before the election > Election day vote > VBM ballots received latter > provisionals.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2016, 04:29:08 PM »

I do believe they count provisionals only after all main-in votes have been counted, right? So I'd expect Clinton's margin to expand after all main-in votes are counted, then it should tighten a bit again after counting whichever provisionals they ultimately end up counting. But I believe this whole process will take quite a few weeks.
There's not really any rush.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2016, 01:36:44 AM »

Seems like there is about 0 chance of Sanders significantly closing the gap with Clinton.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2016, 02:26:13 AM »

Seems like there is about 0 chance of Sanders significantly closing the gap with Clinton.

I think you're definitely jumping the gun a little, there's still so much to count.

Some people on this forum seem to have a bit of an obsession with vote by mail counting that doesn't change much of anything. I'm rather glad most states haven't moved to the system.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2016, 12:04:18 PM »

Clinton: 2,211,549 (55.5%)
Sanders: 1,734,922 (43.6%)
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #8 on: June 24, 2016, 04:03:36 PM »

Gentrification along with a young population.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2016, 10:48:26 PM »

Really glad to see that the autism research grants have been paying impressive dividends.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2016, 08:16:02 PM »

The final margin of victory for Clinton indicates that the California race wasn't a toss up, and all the polls showing a close race were badly off the mark, way outside the margin of error. This is why we use a polling average people!
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2016, 12:15:53 AM »

Benchmark gets to boast again. They said Clinton 54-46 for a couple of weeks before the California primary

Benchmark is total crap...

They throw a few darts at a dartboard and occasionally hit a "20" on their demographic models and then claim they are brilliant...

Sigh...

I pity the poor sods that sent them $20 for their forum rebuild, in order to claim that they were right in a handful of Democratic primaries, despite the huge prediction collapse in many other states.

I could easily pull something similar together off of census info and then mix that with PVI and claim to be the "New 538" and offer a subscription service for the GE, to make a few bucks to pay the rent...


Wink
Their model was consistently good on a statewide level but terrible on the countywide level.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.