The CrabCake Bureau of Funny Post Archival

[Ebsy]

The parties wont stay the same. The Dem party by 2040, will be a full fledged anti-White party. Like the ZA ANC. Kind of like former anti-aprtheid white South Africans who now vote for the National Party.

The Dem party will do everything it has to do to keep blacks and hispancs on the plantation. If that means inflaming racial hatred, they will do it.When they do it, they will lose white votes.

[Ebsy]

Doesn't the body just shut down when it's legitimate child molestation?

[Ebsy]

OR, just like WI and NH will always stay within 5 points with the GOP candidates, with the Dem ahead.

The same timber voters like in MN and Ia, that flirt with GOP, makes it that way. Aside from Portland metro.

Can we ban OC already?

[Ebsy]

Democrats have always believed in slavery for the benefit of the greater good. They enslaved African Americans 100 years ago, now it's fundamentalist Christians.

Nothing changes under the sun. They'll always find a new class of untouchables to exploit.

[Ebsy]

He really is.

[Ebsy]

There's a 5.8% chance of him being a FF and 94.2% chance of him being HP. Now, I am not calling him a HP. You cannot attack me for this because this is NOT an opinion nor is it a prediction.

[Ebsy]

If something is repeated over and over again and is in the public domain, it is not plagiarism. Both Melania Trump and Michelle Obama likely said the similar things with similar construct to what many, many other politicians have said in the past.

People are talking about a few sentences from two paragraphs in a lengthy speech, which basically state one of the concepts that politicians on either side of the aisle agree upon. I consider what both parties said to be political truisms for any candidate seeking election.

Since it is political stock, speechwriters have a tendency to formulate that particular thought in a similar manner -- almost formalistically.

The words that were written for Michelle Obama were hardly new. They were also likely likewise appropriated from some other speech. This happens all the time in politics.

The fact that the press is making such a big deal over a matter that is trivial is an absolute and complete joke. You probably could go through just about every speech made on that floor on Monday and find one or two paragraphs of those speeches that came from somewhere else.

It's political rhetoric.

As is typical on this forum, there's a knee-jerk overreaction to both the gravity of the alleged infraction and the political impact of said infraction. This is much ado about nothing at the end of the day.