"Not religious at all" is poised to overtake "moderately religious" as plurality self-ID response (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 07:21:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  "Not religious at all" is poised to overtake "moderately religious" as plurality self-ID response (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "Not religious at all" is poised to overtake "moderately religious" as plurality self-ID response  (Read 859 times)
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,782


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


« on: April 16, 2023, 09:24:34 PM »
« edited: April 16, 2023, 09:36:34 PM by 14 Down, 36 To Go »

I do somewhat question polling questions that showed mostly stable results followed by one sudden spike (without an obvious precipitating event).  I have no doubt that the general trend has been in this direction, but the sudden spike in the last couple years doesn't feel accurate at all.

EDITED TO ADD: In some evangelical circles, "religious" has become a bit of a dirty word, as some view it as referring to rituals and liturgy that many evangelicals reject as unnecessary.  The idea is that "religion" refers to a more works-based theology.  Hence, the statement "it's not a religion, but a relationship" or even "I'm not religious, but I have a personal relationship with Jesus".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.