Isn't abolishing EC, etc. a Democratic power grab in some voters eyes? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 03:34:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Isn't abolishing EC, etc. a Democratic power grab in some voters eyes? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Isn't abolishing EC, etc. a Democratic power grab in some voters eyes?  (Read 3114 times)
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,679
United States


« on: March 20, 2019, 05:49:24 PM »

The EC is an American tradition and we should preserve it. The founders wanted this so, that small states have some say in who is elected and CA, TX, NY, and FL do not outvote everyone

The framers also wanted slavery, an appointed Senate, and for women to be property with no rights and we got rid of all three.
Those three things are morally wrong. Allowing all 50 states to decide an election, instead of 4 gigantic states (CA, TX, FL, and NY) is morally correct.

The state borders would be irrelevant in a national election.   If it's a national office why does it matter where geographically in the country someone lives?    The President can affect someone in Kansas as much as someone in NYC.   

A vote would be a vote, a person would be a person.   "People" in NYC wouldn't get more of a say than "people" in Kansas.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 11 queries.