Obama and Holder to fight Gerrymandering in post-Trump (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 01:13:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Obama and Holder to fight Gerrymandering in post-Trump (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Obama and Holder to fight Gerrymandering in post-Trump  (Read 1758 times)
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,712
United States


« on: October 17, 2016, 08:02:53 AM »

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/obama-holder-redistricting-gerrymandering-229868

Looks like anti-gerrymandering efforts are becoming quite mainstream.    It's no longer as American as apple pie,  much to the disappointment of many Republicans.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,712
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2016, 10:47:07 AM »

The article suggests that this will be a purely partisan attempt to eliminate gerrymandering in Pub-held states. I don't see this effort working to change the process in MD or IL. I'd rather see a well-funded campaign that went after gerrymandering on both sides.

Once the two sides gerrymander to equal levels of seats....then a bipartisan effort can be launched.

Until then the Republicans are CLEARLY the bigger offenders, to suggest otherwise is completely laughable.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,712
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2016, 08:19:25 PM »

The article suggests that this will be a purely partisan attempt to eliminate gerrymandering in Pub-held states. I don't see this effort working to change the process in MD or IL. I'd rather see a well-funded campaign that went after gerrymandering on both sides.

Once the two sides gerrymander to equal levels of seats....then a bipartisan effort can be launched.

Until then the Republicans are CLEARLY the bigger offenders, to suggest otherwise is completely laughable.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland%27s_3rd_congressional_district#/media/File%3AMaryland_US_Congressional_District_3_(since_2013).tif

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Maryland_congressional_districts#/media/File%3AMaryland_US_Congressional_District_2_(since_2013).tif

Should we start a list of gerrymandered districts that benefit one party over the other?
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,712
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2016, 09:31:40 PM »

Yes, Maryland is heavily gerrymandered, and I would be more than willing to give up 1 seat in Maryland for all the gerrymandered seats Democrats would net in New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, etc.

Texas, North Carolina, Michigan, Georgia, Alabama, Virginia (VA-10)...
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,712
United States


« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2016, 08:42:26 AM »


Republicans gerrymander in many states, [...]to Texas(+5 at least)[...]


It's Eleventy-Seven or more.

If a state like California can at least "Try" for fair maps (via an independent commission) there's no excuse Texas can't do the same unless they're afraid of the vote of their people.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.