FL: Rereredistricting (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 04:08:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  FL: Rereredistricting (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: FL: Rereredistricting  (Read 33646 times)
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,728
United States


« Reply #50 on: January 01, 2016, 07:57:02 PM »
« edited: January 01, 2016, 08:03:29 PM by Nyvin »

If anyone doesn't mind, I have a question about these maps and others. What are the chances Democrats will be able to obtain a majority in the State Senate with these new maps? Because the way this reads, it almost seems like the base composition could now be 18 (D) / 22 (R) or 19 (D) / 21 (R). Sort of how the Virginia State Senate is. Given this, a bare majority on a good year does indeed at least seem possible.

Also, how come the State House maps were never challenged? If the State Senate maps were gerrymandered, I would think the State House maps would at least be vulnerable to a challenge (only because to me, it would seem too unrealistic for one chamber to rig their maps and the other to not). I mean, Republicans have a pretty large majority in the State House but now with the State Senate, it looks very close. How can there be such a large discrepancy?

It's hard to imagine the Democrats not winning at least 17 seats with the new map.    Getting the last 4 will probably be tricky though.    

The open seats Obama won marginally in 2012 will obviously be top targets,  SD-7 and SD-17.     Also it looks like a lot of the seats in the southern half of Miami-Dade will be key too,   relying on the continuing trend of Hispanic's shift leftward there.    

There's definitely a possibility of a Dem majority,  if not in 2016, then certainly by 2020.

The good news is that none of the Democrat's areas are trending Republican except maybe SD-7.     And a lot of the marginal seats in the Miami and Central Florida area actually shifted leftward from 2008 to 2012.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,728
United States


« Reply #51 on: January 04, 2016, 02:08:35 PM »

Looking over the map a bit better,  it looks like I'd call it somewhere in the range of 15 safe D,  2 likely D (7 and 38), and probably 5 tossups?   The incumbent situation in SD-38 is kinda unknown at this point though.     The tossups would probably be SD-17, SD-35, SD-37, SD-18(maybe...) and then an outside chance with SD-22.

SD-7, SD-17, SD-18, and maybe SD-38 will all be open seats.   I guess with SD-22 there's a chance Charlie Crist's popularity in the area will knock out Brandes, but meh, maybe not.

SD-35 and SD-37 would have to rely on the continued trend of Cubans and Hispanics in Miami-Dade to the Democrats. 

I suppose the Democrats could make a play at SD-15 (Stargel-R) and SD-20 (Latvala-R),  but it's Florida Democrats we're talking about here, so they won't beat any semi-popular incumbents outside of the Miami Area....so forget it.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.