"Ordinary language," antiintellectualism, and language as a barrier to understanding (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 03:28:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  "Ordinary language," antiintellectualism, and language as a barrier to understanding (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "Ordinary language," antiintellectualism, and language as a barrier to understanding  (Read 1769 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,271
United States


« on: July 28, 2022, 05:45:23 PM »

This is a good topic and I am following this thread with interest.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,271
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2022, 02:54:25 PM »

The difference between Kant and Hegel and modern day "intellectuals" is that the former weren't posting on social media. That sounds a bit snippy and silly but certain people really need to understand how ineffective it is to write such dense prose on somewhere like Twitter and then act shocked when ordinary people don't understand or relate to them. Similarly telling a "normie" "go read Judith Butler" is not a great way to make your case for obvious reasons. The Onion nailed this in one of their best ever videos.



That one was a classic.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.