Ainsely Earhardt: You can't pick and choose which riots are bad (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 11:43:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Ainsely Earhardt: You can't pick and choose which riots are bad (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ainsely Earhardt: You can't pick and choose which riots are bad  (Read 1743 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,711
United States


« on: July 23, 2022, 05:37:59 PM »

A lot more people should have been jailed over the 2020 riots. Looting is looting, and damaging property is against the law.
That "some people" on social media would cry all sorts of negative labels at this doesn't matter one iota. The law is the law.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,711
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2022, 11:11:16 AM »

Congress only cares about those victims of riots least deserving of sympathy: themselves.

Aside from the obvious ideological motivations this is another factor for the difference in reaction despite the summer 2020 riots having a considerably higher degree of violence. The 2020 violence wasn't happening in parts of towns where members of Congress live so it didn't directly impact them.

And of course just because it can't be said enough; the majority of people harmed or worse during the 2020 BLM protests were protestors attacked by police or by violent alt-right counter-protestors.
Is this counting or not counting the many victims, direct or indirect, of property damage?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,711
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2022, 11:35:49 AM »
« Edited: July 25, 2022, 11:44:33 AM by Southern Delegate and Atlasian AG Punxsutawney Phil »

Congress only cares about those victims of riots least deserving of sympathy: themselves.

Aside from the obvious ideological motivations this is another factor for the difference in reaction despite the summer 2020 riots having a considerably higher degree of violence. The 2020 violence wasn't happening in parts of towns where members of Congress live so it didn't directly impact them.

And of course just because it can't be said enough; the majority of people harmed or worse during the 2020 BLM protests were protestors attacked by police or by violent alt-right counter-protestors.
Is this counting or not counting the many victims, direct or indirect, of property damage?

Can't say I give a rats ass about property damage, typically covered by insurance companies any way, compared to human life. Obviously I don't condone it as a form of regular peaceful-protesting.
While that's not a verboten position in any way and I respect that, it's just important to note that people can be harmed due to property damage.
(That is all)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.