Fair redistricting: California (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 01:21:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Fair redistricting: California (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Fair redistricting: California  (Read 14094 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,380
United States


« on: February 20, 2018, 03:28:42 PM »

Here's my New Mexico proposal. Sandoval and Bernallillo are the only split counties; Bernallillo is split along reservation lines.




The logic was to keep the Albequerque metro in as few districts as possible, and to unite as much of the Native groups in the NW as possible. It turned out that the best way to accomplish both was by having NM-01 donut hole around the city. NM-01 is plurality Latinx by population but plurality White by VAP, Natives are a strong minority.

NM-01: Dv. -119, PVI D+8.49
NM-02: Dv. +66, PVI R+7.01
NM-03: Dv. +53, PVI D+7.15
I love the beauty of this map.
What's the Native % in NM-01?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,380
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2018, 04:47:18 PM »
« Edited: February 20, 2018, 04:52:26 PM by Southern Delegate TimTurner »

[empty-quoting this just to redouble my previous expression of support for this map]
Also, this is post #6000.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,380
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2018, 07:55:34 PM »

Aww, thanks y'all.

@Timturner--NM-01 is 20.9% Indian, 19.3% by VAP. So not a majority or even a plurality, but it's still a pretty high percentage. I'm not sure whether the number on Wikipedia is VAP or total population, but either way it's not especially different from the current NM-03 in Native population.
Your map is so good I plan on voting for it over a whole-county map I plan on submitting.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,380
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2018, 11:12:23 PM »


This one splits no counties but likely splits a reservation or two.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,380
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2018, 03:05:13 PM »

I'll start building a table to post SPICE scores for NM submissions here. NM has a PVI of D+3 and that projects to an advantage of 0.36 of a seat for the Dems. Rounding to whole numbers that would require a plan with 1 D 1R and 1 even seat to have a SKEW of 0. I think all the plans are 2 D and 1 R and they will have a SKEW of 1. The Albuquerque UCC is Bernalillo, Sandoval and Valencia and if those counties have more than 2 CDs it counts as an extra chop, as it does if no CD is nested in those three counties. A plan that picks up just the precinct needed to keep a reservation whole does not count as a chop, but if it picks up additional precincts in the chopped county it does count as a chop.

Plan-S--P--I--C--E-
HCP165412
Sol163114
Solid4096165220
TimTurner1611212
jimrtex165220

Jimrtex's whole county plan is the same as Solid4096.

If Sol is actually getting better scores with his very flawed plan than other plans that actually use sensible design methodology, then I think there is something that needs to be fixed with the muon rules. Probably the underlined part.
The muon rules are designed that way as to encourage keeping CDs within the cores of metropolitan areas; something that isn't exactly a bad objective to seek.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.