If Montana gets another House seat, shoud there be one or two districts? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 12:01:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  If Montana gets another House seat, shoud there be one or two districts? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Two districts or second at-large seat if population grows enough?
#1
2nd district (R)
 
#2
another at-large seat (R)
 
#3
2nd district (D)
 
#4
another at-large seat (D)
 
#5
2nd district (L)
 
#6
another at-large seat (L)
 
#7
2nd district (C)
 
#8
another at-large seat (C)
 
#9
2nd district (G)
 
#10
another at-large seat (G)
 
#11
2nd district (S)
 
#12
another at-large seat (S)
 
#13
2nd district (I/O)
 
#14
another at-large seat (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 33

Author Topic: If Montana gets another House seat, shoud there be one or two districts?  (Read 2044 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,711
United States


« on: December 23, 2016, 01:19:23 AM »

I don't get At-Large House seats for states with more than 1 CD. Proportional.
The state would not have more than one district, it would have just one at-large district represented by two different House members elected separately. Two different districts in MT would each be more partisan.
One R+~6 and one Tossup/D+1 seems more likely.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.