Why the 2004 election and 2012 election were really similer (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 06:52:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why the 2004 election and 2012 election were really similer (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why the 2004 election and 2012 election were really similer  (Read 2775 times)
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


« on: March 18, 2015, 10:21:27 PM »

 Both Kerry and Romney's bases were absolutely convinced that they were going to win prior to Election Day and both used flawed methodology to back their arguments, I remember the weekend before the 04 election a popular theory emerging on left-wing blogs that liberals were more likely to only have cell phones which weren't polled and as a result the polls were skewed against Kerry.
Logged
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2015, 03:58:53 PM »

I'll add one, both Kerry and Romney had animal stories which were originally told to make them look decisive but just came off looking creepy. Obviously Romney's was worse, he tied his dog to the roof of the car and Kerry giving COR to licorice the hamster.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.