MT-SEN (Gravis): Tester + 4 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 10:54:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls
  MT-SEN (Gravis): Tester + 4 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MT-SEN (Gravis): Tester + 4  (Read 2543 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


« on: September 25, 2018, 08:54:45 AM »

MT-AL results:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/Gravis_September_25_2018.pdf

Anyway, a MT Democrat winning by 4?! When has that ever happened before? Tongue The Senate numbers are believable, the House numbers... less so. It’s better than their last poll, but that’s a very low bar.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2018, 10:06:19 AM »

MT-AL results:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/Gravis_September_25_2018.pdf

Anyway, a MT Democrat winning by 4?! When has that ever happened before? Tongue The Senate numbers are believable, the House numbers... less so. It’s better than their last poll, but that’s a very low bar.

I don’t believe 17% of Democrats voting for Greg Gianforte for a second, but it’s Gravis so I shouldn’t expect much.

Their crosstabs can be very weird, I honestly wouldn’t pay any attention to them. But yeah, I know this forum is convinced that Montana is the most elaaaaaaaastic state in the country, but I’d be very surprised if Gianforte did 13 points better than Rosendale. Obviously there will be no shortage of Tester/Gianforte voters (and let’s be honest here: Williams' first name doesn’t help), but Gianforte, while not an extremely weak incumbent, isn’t exactly someone with a lot of crossover appeal, and I fail to see in which areas of the state he’s going to do much better than last time around. My current prediction is Tester +3, Gianforte +5/6, and I wouldn’t call either race "safe" for the incumbent (Lean D and R, respectively, is a fair rating at this point IMO).

Also, I’m not sure where this idea that Fox is the electoral savior of the MT Republican Party who will make MT-GOV 2020 Safe R comes from.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2018, 10:27:50 AM »

"Tester's Numbers Beginning to Sink Amidst Trump Attention"? I doubt he was ever ahead by more than 4 or 5 points in this race.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2018, 10:47:40 AM »

Of course Gravis would only poll Garfield County...

They probably only polled pro-life, gun-owning, hardcore Republicans from Winnett.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2018, 08:30:23 AM »

Believable top line.

Tester was never going to win by a lot. I think people's confidence in Tester derives from this being a static, 3-5 point Lean D race for the entirety of the campaign.

Yeah, I don't know where this idea that he was gonna run away with it by 10+ points came from.

People attaching too much importance to "candidate quality" and exaggerating the state's "elasticity". What’s new?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.