Wait. Before I reply to you, Crab, I want to make sure that we're talking about the same thing, which is an issue because I'm not a native speaker. I assumed "we need to raise taxes on the rich" means that rich people need to pay more than they currently do (talking about an American context, not about a Dutch context). However, based on your reply I get the idea that "to raise taxes on the rich" could as well simply mean "to tax the rich"(or: "we need to have a system of progressive taxation"). Is that true, and did you argue along those lines? If that's the case, then my argumentation would be different (and in the first case my answer would be different as well, since I do think we should tax the rich - just as much as the poor, through a flat tax).
All those silver spooned kids took tremendous risks and added to the market by popping out of the vagina of a rich mother who had a rich husband.
That is literally nonsense for many people. Personal example: my grandfather worked in a factory all his life, coming from an
extremely poor background. My father is a working-class guy, he built his own successful company himself by working 80 to 90 hours a week, every week. While I do agree he should contribute to the social system etc., I do not think at all it's fair to characterize stories like these as people who "were lucky" or "popped out of a rich mother". For every silver spooner, there are so many hard-working people who, in Republican terms,
did build that.