Is it surprising that we've never had a president named Joe until today? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 03:22:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Is it surprising that we've never had a president named Joe until today? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is it surprising that we've never had a president named Joe until today?  (Read 547 times)
Pouring Rain and Blairing Music
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,815
United States


« on: January 20, 2021, 08:42:37 PM »

It’s gonna be a weird four (eight?) years for me because my first name isn’t actually Fubart.
Logged
Pouring Rain and Blairing Music
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,815
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2021, 09:01:30 PM »

It’s gonna be a weird four (eight?) years for me because my first name isn’t actually Fubart.

Sacramento Joe

I’d propose that we all call him Scranton Joe or Diamond Joe, but his career is twenty years older than me, so I guess I don’t get dibs.
Logged
Pouring Rain and Blairing Music
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,815
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2021, 12:50:59 PM »

Kind of. It's actually always been a common name - certainly far more so than Grover, Millard or Rutherford. But we've only had 46 presidents, and with such a tiny sample size, you can get weird results.

Some of them went by their middle names. Woodrow instead of Thomas and Grover instead of Stephen come to mind.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.