Who ran the worst campaign this year (D&R) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 03:30:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Who ran the worst campaign this year (D&R) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Democrats:
 
#2
Hillary Clinton
 
#3
Bernie Sanders
 
#4
Martin O'Malley
 
#5
Lincoln Chafee
 
#6
Jim Webb
 
#7
Lawrence Lessing
 
#8
Republicans:
 
#9
Donald Trump
 
#10
John Kasich
 
#11
Ted Cruz
 
#12
Marco Rubio
 
#13
Ben Carson
 
#14
Jeb Bush
 
#15
Jim Gilmore
 
#16
Carly Fiorina
 
#17
Chris Christie
 
#18
Rand Paul
 
#19
Rick Santorum
 
#20
Mike Huckabee
 
#21
George Pataki
 
#22
Lindsey Graham
 
#23
Bobby Jindal
 
#24
Scott Walker
 
#25
Rick Perry
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 143

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Who ran the worst campaign this year (D&R)  (Read 2731 times)
JMT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,152


« on: June 13, 2016, 11:02:43 AM »

I picked O'Malley and Walker, because both were largely hyped and had a real opportunity to become serious candidates / their party's nominee and they completely blew it. O'Malley was talked about as the major Hillary Clinton alternative, and he practically lived in Iowa prior to the election and only received about 0.5%. Realistically, he should've been the Hillary alternative and he allowed a 75 year old Democratic socialist from Vermont to steal that title from him. I love Bernie, and of course Bernie's strengths played into his rise (it wasn't only O'Malley that led to Bernie's rise) but I feel like O'Malley should've performed stronger.

For me personally, I never expected Jeb Bush to win. He wouldn't have rallied the more conservative voters needed to win a primary, and he was generally boring. Not to mention, I think "Bush fatigue" is real and he would have been far from the best candidate to beat Hillary in the general election. A main argument against Clinton is to have a fresh face and to avoid political dynasties, so nominating Bush wouldn't have made sense. That being said, I think Scott Walker ran the worst campaign on the GOP side. He was largely hyped: he's young, appeals to both the establishment and the more conservative Tea Party types, and won election as Governor 3 times in a blue state like Wisconsin. The fact his campaign didn't even make it past September is a huge embarrassment to him and his campaign team. They had a perfect resume to win a GOP nomination and blew it. Of course, no one saw the rise of Trump and no candidate really knew what to do about it, but Scott Walker should've at least lasted until Iowa..
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 15 queries.