The Klartext Landfill for Absurd, Ignorant, and Deplorable Posts VI

[Intell]

Moderate heroism at its finest.

Ok, where do I go to donate money to Lynch? If there's anything I dislike more than the alt-right, it's social justice warriors.

For me - they are mirror images of each other. So - i equally dislike BOTH...

People who care about racial issues are JUST AS BAD as neo-Nazis!!!!!1

No. People who are unable able to listen , always think they are (and - only they) - right, and impose their point of view on other by ANY means (including slander) are as bad as neo-Nazis. I am color-blind, so i am absolutely for ALL possible rights for minorities, and as absolutely - against ANY privileges for them

Nothing wrong with opposing affirmative action, it is the morally correct position.

Thanks for posting this right in here !

Your brand of politics is the reason Democrats are struggling. Congrats!

Your brand of a**hole is the reason people don't like you!

Opposing Affirmative Action, is a right position though.

[Intell]

Why does consent matter in terms of morality? Is it acceptable to take drugs, because you consented to it. Is it acceptable to have a sword fight to the death if both parties consented to it? Consent matters jack shyte, in laws or morality.

Well, I would say that the lack of consent matters a very great deal to morality and laws...

Lack of Consent, yes, giving consent should not matter on a vast of majority of circumstances.

Consent, or giving it, should not matter in terms of laws, just because you consent to it, should not make it legally right. Consent does not matter. Lack of consent makes such a already immoral, or even moral action be bad or even worse. Consent should definitely not define morality, just because you consented to it, does not make it morally acceptable.

[Intell]

The people who need to get an education are those Trump supporters who sit around waiting to get paid $50 an hour to glue parts to something and blame minorities for those jobs going away. Let's be real about who is sitting around blaming other people for their own failings.

I guess, democrats are going to be the party of thatcher now!

[Intell]

Why do so many people vote no on 1986? It was a revenue neutral tax reform plan that passed with broad bipartisan support.


But I would easily vote yes on both.

Cause the far left believes that all tax cuts are bad and the only good changes to tax laws is if you increase taxes.

That would be correct, especially if it's for the rich.

Lol.

This isn't bad. While I don't entirely agree with it, it certainly doesn't belong here.

The implication is that raising taxes on the rich is never a bad idea. No exceptions. Not even if the tax rate is in the 90's already. That is pretty absurd.

Never said it's never a bad idea, we need tax increases, for the rich and upper-middle class to pre 1980 levels (or even higher for the rich).

[Intell]

Why do so many people vote no on 1986? It was a revenue neutral tax reform plan that passed with broad bipartisan support.


But I would easily vote yes on both.

Cause the far left believes that all tax cuts are bad and the only good changes to tax laws is if you increase taxes.

That would be correct, especially if it's for the rich.

Lol.

This isn't bad. While I don't entirely agree with it, it certainly doesn't belong here.

The implication is that raising taxes on the rich is never a bad idea. No exceptions. Not even if the tax rate is in the 90's already. That is pretty absurd.

Never said it's never a bad idea, we need tax increases, for the rich and upper-middle class to pre 1980 levels (or even higher for the rich).

You responded to someone saying "the only good changes to tax laws is if you increase taxes." with "That would be correct, especially if it's for the rich."

At this stage, definitely, the only changes to the taxation system is if you increase taxes for the rich. In saying that, I was referring to the Reagan tax cuts, which reduced taxes only for the upper-middle class and the rich, class, such tax cuts should never have happened, as as such, they need to be rectified with tax increases for such tax brackets.

I support tax cuts for the poor, and lower-middle class, so taxation cuts are fine if done for the poor and the lower-middle class, but the only solution for taxation for the upper-middle class and the rich now is to increase them, and in the 80's, maintain as it was, though increases for such brackets would be much preferable to cuts.

[Intell]

Hillary, without hesitation. Better the horrifying neoliberalism of Hillary than outright embracing fascism.

Apparently voting for Tulsi Gabbard is embracing fascism.

She is a fascist hindutva supported, who was in Syria, based upon an anti-semitic group, and meet a foreign dictator, that kills many of it's citizens.

[Intell]

Most city areas are trash, unless their working class not ghetto but poor ones, in which these areas are also trash, but my kind of trash.

[Intell]

Retro's ratings:



Doctor-assisted suicide: Highly support! I should go to a health care protest with a sign that says "We need more death panels!"




Abortion:  There's too many people in the world anyway. Also, in some cases, I would go so far to favor that abortion should be required in situations of severe birth defects or disabilities. People may deny it, but everyone who wants a child most importantly wants them to be healthy and not a useless tumor.

[Intell]

He's totally right on doctor-assisted suicide, and besides, this thread is for legitimately bad posts, not "I disagree with his politics".

Go into a protest with a sign that says "more death panels!", ok then.