Atlasia is not a country that needs feminism. If we were talking about promoting feminist reforms for, say, Afghanistan, I am confident the numbers in favor would be much higher.
The problem with this argument (apart, of course, from the fact that women still face huge barriers to achieving full social and economic parity, and that tending the flame of feminism is therefore of great importance) is that is could be used to justify opposition to any of the victories for human rights in this country since independence. For example, one could just as easily argue that
"Atlasia is not a country that needs republicanism. If we were talking about promoting republican reforms for, say, Afghanistan, I am confident the numbers in favor would be much higher."
See the problem?