Pacific Referendum Rights Bill (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 04:57:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Pacific Referendum Rights Bill (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Pacific Referendum Rights Bill (Failed)  (Read 2181 times)
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« on: November 21, 2015, 02:21:31 PM »

Obvious sabotage attempt is obvious. I will not support this bill.

Lest there be any doubts that the argument in favor of this bill is completely irrational, let us examine the case made by the South American Prime Minister:

CLAIM: The Pacific is inactive because the federal government has stripped the Regions of their Constitutional responsibilities.
FACT: While the second clause of this statement is arguably grounded in some fact (hence my support for devolution efforts at the ConCon), the first clause is patently false. Other Regions, such as the Northeast and my native Mideast, have managed to remain active in spite of the same constraints on their authority experienced by the Pacific. If Regional inactivity was attributable to the increased influence of the federal government, then every Region would be like the Pacific today; this is simply not the case. Rather, the Pacific is struggling today as a result of poor historical leadership and a shrinking population - problems that will be remedied through consolidation, not secession.

CLAIM: If the Pacific were granted independence, it would soon become a paradise of activity.
FACT: This is irrational: one might as well argue that the best way to end world hunger is to eliminate soup kitchens. There is no logical reason to believe that independence would lead to increased activity in the Pacific; to the contrary, it would likely lead to decreased activity, as no doubt many pro-Union Pacificans would leave the Region rather than be exiled from Atlasia.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2015, 01:34:14 PM »

Enthusiastic, unequivocal NAY!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.