What is the liberal ethical argument against necrophilia? (Harm vs disgust) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 10:22:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  What is the liberal ethical argument against necrophilia? (Harm vs disgust) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What is the liberal ethical argument against necrophilia? (Harm vs disgust)  (Read 2879 times)
catographer
Megameow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,498
United States
« on: June 18, 2018, 07:55:26 PM »

1) i agree with the consent arguments. same reason sex with animals is illegal; they cant possibly consent, and whether they're aware of that is irrelevant. a baby isn't aware of what consent is either but they still can't give it.
2) harm v disgust argument may also apply to consensual adult incest. what's the harm to society? especially if they don't reproduce because of it (same sex incest).
3) i lean towards being against disgust as an appropriate basis for ethical and legal standards. but certainly it's constitutional to do so in the US so we might as well use it anyway.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 9 queries.