Why Oregon gubernatorial races are more competitive than on presidential level? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 10:40:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why Oregon gubernatorial races are more competitive than on presidential level? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why Oregon gubernatorial races are more competitive than on presidential level?  (Read 1783 times)
catographer
Megameow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,498
United States
« on: December 30, 2017, 03:13:51 AM »

Frankly, all gubernatorial races are more competitive than the Presidential level. I think it's because state parties and state party brands are more fine-tuned to the constituencies and voters there; Republicans in Mass are much more liberal than those in Bama, for example.

Only 3 states have had only Democratic Governors since 2000: Washington, Oregon, and Delaware.
Only 8 states have had only Republican Governors since 2000: Texas, Florida, North & South Dakota, Nebraska, Utah, Idaho, Nevada.

All other states have had at least 1 Governor from each party since 2000.

In Presidential elections, all but 13 states have voted for only 1 party since 2000.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.