Scottish Parliament election - 5th May 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 05:45:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Scottish Parliament election - 5th May 2016 (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Scottish Parliament election - 5th May 2016  (Read 43317 times)
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #50 on: May 05, 2016, 05:10:52 PM »

ITV Border are suggesting that Labour will lose Dumfries (currently their safest seat in Scotland).

By the way me and others will be discussing the election in IRC tonight, link here: client02.chat.mibbit.com

Type in your username next to nick and "#atlasforum" next to channel
I'll join you guys later - when we start getting some results in.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #51 on: May 05, 2016, 05:45:09 PM »

Labour insiders are reporting that Rutherglen has been gained by the SNP.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #52 on: May 05, 2016, 06:04:40 PM »

Orkney turnout: 62% (+13%)
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #53 on: May 05, 2016, 06:11:00 PM »

Rutherglen turnout: 54.5% (+6.8%)
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #54 on: May 05, 2016, 06:39:27 PM »

Edinburgh Southern 3 way Tory SNP Labour according to Sky. About the only constituency Labour can win in Scotland 
Pretty much - they won the equivalent Westminster seat last year.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #55 on: May 05, 2016, 06:41:27 PM »

Scotland Decides (‏@ScotDecides)
STV CALL: SNP are set to GAIN Rutherglen #sp16
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #56 on: May 05, 2016, 06:47:44 PM »
« Edited: May 05, 2016, 06:50:31 PM by Clyde1998 »

Orkney
Lib - 7,096 (67.4%; +31.6)
SNP - 2,562 (24.3%; -0.8)
Con - 435 (4.1%; -4.3)
Lab - 304 (2.9%; -2.7)
Ind - 137 (1.3%; +1.3)

Swing - 16% from SNP to Lib
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #57 on: May 05, 2016, 06:57:20 PM »

Rutherglen
SNP - 15,222 (46%; +7)
Lab - 11,479 (35%; -11)
Con - 3,718 (11%; +4)
Lib - 2,533 (8%; +3)

Swing - 9% from Lab to SNP
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #58 on: May 06, 2016, 01:37:39 AM »

I'm going to predict the SNP will lose their majority, but will form minority government.

(I'm an SNP member, btw)
As I said...
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #59 on: May 06, 2016, 06:13:42 AM »

I find it interesting that in Edinburgh CON LAB and LD all managed to win 1 seat with all of them through anti-SNP tactical voting.  Very strategic voters that can correctly identify the largest opponent of SNP and vote correctly for three different parties to defeat SNP.
I wonder how strong the other parties' campaign were in these seats, as well.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #60 on: May 06, 2016, 01:28:08 PM »

Given that the Scottish Parliament was gaining tax powers (that the parties could actually use), I think it became inevitable that the Conservatives would become one of the two largest parties at some point - as I can't think of any powerful parliament, in terms of taxation, where the two largest parties both identify as centre-left.

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out in future elections.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #61 on: May 06, 2016, 05:48:36 PM »

Lol at the RISE hype party being beaten by Tommy Sheridan's Solidarity.

that's not the most pathetic bit

they got less votes that the scottish christian party
Could be worse: The Women's Equality Party got about half the amount of vote RISE got, and they only stood in two regions (RISE stood in all).
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #62 on: May 06, 2016, 05:55:14 PM »

I've had a play with the numbers and worked out that the SNP should remain the largest party in 2021, baring another huge shift in Scottish Politics - could effectively be 19 years of SNP Government by the end of that term...

Labour require a direct swing (direct from SNP voters on both ballots, assuming other vote shares don't change) of 11.3% from the SNP to win more seats than them; Conservatives need 12.9% swing direct from the SNP. The Conservatives need a direct swing of 21.5% from the SNP to win a majority; Labour need a 25.5% direct swing.

For comparision, the swing from Labour to the SNP between 2003 and 2011 was 12.3% on the constituency ballot and 13.1% on the regional ballot.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #63 on: May 07, 2016, 06:21:56 PM »

My 'debate' with a commenter on ScotGoesPop: https://scotgoespop.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/a-new-podcast-and-new-article-on-why.html#comment-form

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I wonder what there defence will be, if at all. Tongue

Feel free to pick holes in my comment, now I've said that Cheesy
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #64 on: May 10, 2016, 11:30:58 AM »

Partick Harvie puts the independence question back on the table, saying that the Greens will support another referendum if Scotland is dragged out the EU against its will: http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/14481294.Harvie__Greens_will_back_referendum_if_Scotland_dragged_out_of_EU
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #65 on: May 12, 2016, 08:14:06 AM »
« Edited: May 12, 2016, 08:27:08 AM by Clyde1998 »

That's not particularly shocking, I'm pretty sure that he's mentioned that before.

I've done some maths; and I'm pretty sure we can credit at least two of the Green gains to the Lib Dems gaining a constituency seat.  Pat got in easy in Glasgow (I think the last seat was between Labour and the Greens, I haven't checked) as did Alison in Lothian; and John Finnie got back in the Highlands comfortably, although benefitting from two easy Lib Dem seats.  In Lothian had the SNP held Edinburgh Western the Lib Dems would have taken the last list seat by about 900 votes which would have denied Andy Wightman the last seat; while in Mid Scotland and Fife the Lib Dems would have taken the Mark Ruskell's list seat if Rennie hadn't gained North East Fife.  Also, I'm pretty sure that Jackie Bailie can be credited for getting Ross Greer into the Scottish Parliament; which certainly annoys a certain group of people.

This makes me think that its much harder for smaller parties like the Greens (and the Lib Dems in much of Scotland) to get representation on the list if one party sweeps an entire region; because the other major parties don't have their votes divided meaning that they'll take most of the list seats before their votes divide enough to let smaller parties have a shout at a seat.  Its the system working in the way that it should, but it does create a bit of a farcical situation where Green voters (or UKIP, or other smaller parties which don't really contest constituencies) should vote tactically for parties that they might totally disagree with since the effect isn't that party having more seats in parliament; but the Greens getting an extra seat.  I don't know if this is something that needs to be solved; perhaps it could be if you add a few more list seats or move to Sainte-Lague or something: although the latter makes it much more likely that odd parties with 2% of the vote get in and the former isn't something that's likely to be popular.  My position on this is certainly effected by my political leanings; so you probably shouldn't listen to me.

England and Wales Green party policy is generally in favour of STV, but I'm not actually sure that it would help us that much at Holyrood. Afaik the Scots Greens have no real appetite to change the voting system (except for Westminster) now that STV is bedded in for local govt and MMP gives reasonable results
I think the only change that should be made to the Holyrood system is an additional two list seats per region, making it 73 constituencies and 72 regional seats, to make the system as close to a 50-50 split between constituency and regional MSPs as possible.

For 2016, that would've produced:
SNP 68 seats (+5 on actual result)
Con 34 (+3)
Lab 29 (+5)
Grn 9 (+3)
Lib 5 (NC)

The only real change to the outcome of any previous election would've been 2003, where the Labour-Liberal coalition would've been two seats short of a majority:

2011: SNP 74 (+4), Lab 42 (+5), Con 19 (+4), Lib 6 (+1), Grn 3 (+1), Oth 1; SNP Majority (+2)
2007: SNP 53 (+6), Lab 50 (+4), Con 20 (+3), Lib 17 (+1), Grn 3 (+1), Sol 1 (+1), Oth 1 (NC); SNP Minority (-20)
2003: Lab 52 (+2), SNP 31 (+4), Con 21 (+3), Lib 19 (+2), Grn 9 (+2), SSP 9 (+3), Oth 4 (+3); Lab/Lib Coalition (-2)
1999: Lab 60 (+4), SNP 43 (+8), Con 21 (+3), Lib 18 (+1), Grn 1, SSP 1, Oth 1; Lab/Lib Coalition (+10)
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #66 on: May 12, 2016, 08:26:50 AM »

If England dragged Scotland out of the EU, then I'd probably support independence. But Scotland should know that its potential membership in the EU would be far from guaranteed.
It's not 100% guaranteed, but I think that most EU countries would welcome Scotland in, especially if this should this happen. To be fair though, most EU countries would do whatever France and Germany tell them to do - both were quiet during IndyRef.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #67 on: May 12, 2016, 08:52:43 AM »
« Edited: May 12, 2016, 09:25:54 AM by Clyde1998 »

Ken Macintosh is the next Presiding Officer:

First Round:
Murdo Fraser (Con) - 23
Johann Lamont (Lab) - 23
Ken Macintosh (Lab) - 58
John Scott (Con) - 17
Elaine Smith (Lab) - 7
Total Votes - 128

Second Round
Murdo Fraser (Con) - 26
Johann Lamont (Lab) - 26
Ken Macintosh (Lab) - 60
John Scott (Con) - 15
Spoilt - 1

Third Round
Murdo Fraser (Con) - 31
Johann Lamont (Lab) - 26
Ken Macintosh (Lab) - 71
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 10 queries.