What is wrong with you? Chicago shall always be the Second City.
God no.
I'll believe it when I see it.
You'll see it in a few years then.
Houston is a up and coming city. Chicago is a stagnant one at best.
In 20 years if growth rates are constant (they wont be)
In 20 years, not much is going to change to make Chicago more appealing, though granted, Houston could easily become less appealing.
What is wrong with you? Chicago shall always be the Second City.
God no.
I'll believe it when I see it.
You'll see it in a few years then.
Houston is a up and coming city. Chicago is a stagnant one at best.
Chicago is an oak; Houston is a mushroom.
You're giving far too much credit to Chicago.