Biden declines to answer question on court-packing (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 11:33:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Biden declines to answer question on court-packing (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Biden declines to answer question on court-packing  (Read 1747 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,389


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« on: September 21, 2020, 10:11:48 PM »

Democrats really are experts at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory .


If they lose this will be the 3rd election this century they have blown along with 2000 and 2016
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,389


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2020, 10:21:14 PM »

Meh.  I get why it works politically -- keep court packing out of the news cycle -- but Biden obviously need to have a better answer prepared for the debates.

It's an annoying truism of our media that despite Biden giving a great speech today about a variety of economic issues, if he had answered the question all the headlines would be "BIDEN AGAINST COURT PACKING", thus putting "COURT PACKING" in front of voters when we really need it to be banished from the news cycle entirely.


It’s not hard then , just say I’ll veto it . That was literally his position in the primary and if Biden opposes court packing is the headline news he would get more popular and do better in the polls
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,389


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2020, 11:10:08 PM »

Democrats really are experts at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory .


If they lose this will be the 3rd election this century they have blown along with 2000 and 2016

2016 was absolutely Republicans to win. Only because they nominated a weak candidate like Trump did they perform as they did. Rubio or Kasich would have done better.

Yes of course but the gop still nominated Trump and Dems should have been able to beat Trump
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.