If you could flip up to 4 senate results without changing the overall balance

[OSR stands with Israel]

in every cycle since 2000 , what would you choose. 

Mine would be

2000: MI, WA, PA , VA
2002:SD, GA
2004: CO, LA
2006: MO, NJ, NV, WY
2008: OR, NH, KY, GA
2010: NV, AR
2012: MA, UT
2014: VA, MN, AR, KS
2016: NH, MO
2018: OH. NV, TN, ND

[OSR stands with Israel]

2000: PA, CT
2002: AR, CO, ME, LA
2004: AR, NC
2006: VA, WV, NV, AZ
2008: NOTA
2010: NOTA
2012: AZ, WV
2014: NOTA
2016: CA
2018: TX, WV, NJ, FL

In 2006 you would rather have Kyl lose than Allen lose

and in 2008 wouldnt you want McConnell to lose so he wouldnt be the GOP Leader during the Obama years,   and in exchange, you could have Gordon Smith a Moderate Republican be reelected (while Merkley a populist Democrat lose).

[OSR stands with Israel]

2000: PA, CT
2002: AR, CO, ME, LA
2004: AR, NC
2006: VA, WV, NV, AZ
2008: NOTA
2010: NOTA
2012: AZ, WV
2014: NOTA
2016: CA
2018: TX, WV, NJ, FL

In 2006 you would rather have Kyl lose than Allen lose

and in 2008 wouldnt you want McConnell to lose so he wouldnt be the GOP Leader during the Obama years,   and in exchange, you could have Gordon Smith a Moderate Republican be reelected (while Merkley a populist Democrat lose).

I guess I'd take the KY/OR flip, but I was mostly focusing on getting rid of marginal seats for Dems (AR, WV, etc) while getting our sunbelt gains sooner. I wouldn't want to give Dems a seat that would immediately flip back unless I do the same to the GOP (like KY/OR, I guess.)

Well the Sunbelt gains wouldn’t have survived 2010 or 2014  , And Smith probably is still a senator if he wins in 08 and Lunsford could also get re-elected  if the GOP was dumb enough to nominate Bevin

[OSR stands with Israel]

2016: Missouri and Alaska go D, Nevada and Illinois go R
2018: Ohio and Virginia go R, Tennessee and, idk, Wyoming? go D.

What what why