The Most Non-Interventionist Potential 2020 Candidate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 07:38:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  The Most Non-Interventionist Potential 2020 Candidate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Most Non-Interventionist Potential 2020 Candidate  (Read 1177 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,319


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« on: August 14, 2017, 03:43:50 PM »

America and the world can't afford non-interventionism. America needs to be involved in the world for its own interests and the world's and stand up for freedom and democracy, Obama was too dovish a President(though at least better than Bush). Hillary Clinton's foreign policy was ideal, what America and the world need is smart power and responsible use of America's power.

Please name a US intervention in a foreign country since 1970 that was a success that greatly improved the situation in that country.

Hard mode: You can't say Kosovo

Grenada , Panama ,  Kuwait ,
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,319


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2017, 03:44:12 PM »

America and the world can't afford non-interventionism. America needs to be involved in the world for its own interests and the world's and stand up for freedom and democracy, Obama was too dovish a President(though at least better than Bush). Hillary Clinton's foreign policy was ideal, what America and the world need is smart power and responsible use of America's power.

Please name a US intervention in a foreign country since 1970 that was a success that greatly improved the situation in that country.

Hard mode: You can't say Kosovo

Heck, you'd be hard pressed to name a successful intervention since 1945.

Korea
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,319


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2017, 10:11:27 PM »

^ Right now is probably not the best time to say that Korea was a successful US intervention. Although relative to other adventures, it was probably less bad.

Are you kidding ,right now proves why intervening in Korea was right , as we stopped the south from falling to the north .
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,319


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2017, 01:52:22 PM »
« Edited: August 15, 2017, 01:55:53 PM by Old School Republican »

Except a communist government can never result in a more free society than South Korea has right now . the fact is the north had no right to invade the south and in reality if we stopped after taking the north's capital we would have had a feee and unified Korea today .


Also about no interventionism being successful since 1945,the Cold War was wildly successful and Eastern Europe is much more free now than it was 50 years ago .
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.