If Trump wasn't the GOP nominee, would Russia still try to influence election? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 19, 2024, 08:42:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  If Trump wasn't the GOP nominee, would Russia still try to influence election? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Trump wasn't the GOP nominee, would Russia still try to influence election?  (Read 1182 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,585


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« on: May 19, 2017, 09:58:22 PM »

Absolutely. The Kremlin has a legendary hatred for Hillary Clinton and wanted her to lose more than anything.

Even if her GOP opponent was either Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush or John Kasich, all hawkish neoconservative Republicans who would have adopted an agressive foreign policy towards Russia?

Would Clinton have been even any less aggressive towards Russia than your average Republican neocon?

If the Kremlin knew they would be in a lose-lose no matter who won, why wouldn't they at least take out the person they particularly despised?

An establishment republican is probably worse to Russia then the democrats .

Remember Romney famous , Russia is our biggest threat and the democrats all freaking out over that statement.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,585


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2017, 01:50:30 AM »

Absolutely. The Kremlin has a legendary hatred for Hillary Clinton and wanted her to lose more than anything.

Even if her GOP opponent was either Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush or John Kasich, all hawkish neoconservative Republicans who would have adopted an agressive foreign policy towards Russia?

Would Clinton have been even any less aggressive towards Russia than your average Republican neocon?

If the Kremlin knew they would be in a lose-lose no matter who won, why wouldn't they at least take out the person they particularly despised?

An establishment republican is probably worse to Russia then the democrats .

Remember Romney famous , Russia is our biggest threat and the democrats all freaking out over that statement.

Perhaps slightly more hostile than Hillary, but it's really a wash when you look at her record and statements in regards to Russia.

The Russians supported obama over romney in 2012 
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,585


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2017, 12:36:03 PM »

Absolutely. The Kremlin has a legendary hatred for Hillary Clinton and wanted her to lose more than anything.

Even if her GOP opponent was either Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush or John Kasich, all hawkish neoconservative Republicans who would have adopted an agressive foreign policy towards Russia?

Would Clinton have been even any less aggressive towards Russia than your average Republican neocon?

If the Kremlin knew they would be in a lose-lose no matter who won, why wouldn't they at least take out the person they particularly despised?

An establishment republican is probably worse to Russia then the democrats .

Remember Romney famous , Russia is our biggest threat and the democrats all freaking out over that statement.

Perhaps slightly more hostile than Hillary, but it's really a wash when you look at her record and statements in regards to Russia.

The Russians supported obama over romney in 2012 

In a pre-Crimea world. And Obama is no Hillary on foreign policy. She's much more hawkish than he ever was on Russia.

Though I remember most Republicans during crimea criticizing Obama for being too weak against russia , and how their were some neo cons who wanted us to send troops to the region.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,585


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2017, 03:53:44 PM »

Absolutely. The Kremlin has a legendary hatred for Hillary Clinton and wanted her to lose more than anything.

Even if her GOP opponent was either Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush or John Kasich, all hawkish neoconservative Republicans who would have adopted an agressive foreign policy towards Russia?

Would Clinton have been even any less aggressive towards Russia than your average Republican neocon?

If the Kremlin knew they would be in a lose-lose no matter who won, why wouldn't they at least take out the person they particularly despised?

An establishment republican is probably worse to Russia then the democrats .

Remember Romney famous , Russia is our biggest threat and the democrats all freaking out over that statement.

Perhaps slightly more hostile than Hillary, but it's really a wash when you look at her record and statements in regards to Russia.

The Russians supported obama over romney in 2012  

In a pre-Crimea world. And Obama is no Hillary on foreign policy. She's much more hawkish than he ever was on Russia.

Though I remember most Republicans during crimea criticizing Obama for being too weak against russia , and how their were some neo cons who wanted us to send troops to the region.

Ok but was there any policy position regarding Russia where Bush, Kasich, or Rubio took a more hawkish approach than Hillary Clinton?

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/local-govt--politics/rubio-russian-takeover-crimea-back-where-were-1939/8AHkvgMBOjX9TmTmRrSS9J/
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.